I recently watched a TED talk about why we evolved brains (to learn how to move). The talk got me thinking about applying a server control system to our environment. This seemed like an interesting way to evaluate the effects of FOX news, Occupy Wall Street and more.
How is system working?---->
Data Input---->
Human Evaluator
/\ |
|________________________________________|
Feedback/Control
Human Evaluator
Each of us as human beings has a set of values and experiences we used to evaluate data. Baser instincts like selfishness, racism, sexism, greed, homophobia and elitism compete with noble instincts like altruism, acceptance, fairness, and equality. Each of us balances the good with the bad and such balances change from day to day.
How is system working?
The answer to this question depends upon the observer. What is of value? A good job, health for you and your loved ones, the basics, and some extras are usual criteria. Some would add the pervasiveness of their religious beliefs.
Data Input
We can detect how the system is working at a local, personal level. We rely on other sources for data about the world outside. FOX News, Rush Limbaugh, blogs, tweets, Rachel Maddow, Chris Hayes, newspapers, friends and others provide outside data and spin for evaluating that data.
Actors, like the Koch brothers, use institutions, like the Heritage Foundation, to package data and spin for consumption. The spin or the frame of the data impacts the human evaluator. Oh, the national debt is a problem. Oh, rampant corporate greed is a problem. Look at this shiny object over here.
Propaganda actors have made sure that we do not ever receive pure data. Over the years, these actors have gotten quite good and setting the questions, posing the problems and providing "the" answers.
Feedback/Control
In a democracy, citizens can use their votes to change the elected public problem solvers. With elected office at the national level either two, four or six years, such change is very, very slow. Email, mail, and phone calls seem to have limited effect except at a tremendously large scale. Who hasn't received a stupid, snotty reply from their elected representative?
Protests, like the Tea Party's in 2010, and the Occupy Wall Street can have a large effect, if the media and the elected representatives pay attention. The Tea Party, to me, was more like directed propaganda with a side helping of angry, batsh*t crazy people following along. Both groups are angry that the normal outlets for feedback and control were not working.
The right has threatened violence with second amendment remedies, and has acted out with bombings of clinics and shootings. The left has not with OWS being particular about peaceful protest. Good on them.
What can we do?
All of us has adjusted our sources of data input and reset our evaluators to detect spin. I still fall for spin and get mad when I realize it. I learned that you must look at the reporter or the paper or the blogger. You must not take anything someone says as true, right off the bat. You have to look and it and decide if it makes sense. Is it corroborated?
We can make sure that we are looking at the real problems and not focused on whatever shiny thing the right uses to distract or obfuscate.
We must use of levers for feedback and control often and wisely. Vote. Protest. Get active.